西西河

主题:给“镭射”的答复 -- 思索

共:💬235 🌺221 新:
全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖
家园 这次终于肯说上下文了,我就知道语境没那么简单

In an interview conducted by The Sunday Times on June 15, 1969, Golda Meir was party to the following exchange:

Q:Do you think the emergence of the Palestinian fighting forces, the Fedayeen, is an important new factor in the Middle East?

A:Important, no. A new factor, yes. There was no such thing as Palestinians. When was there an independent Palestinian people with a Palestinian state? It was either southern Syria before the first world war and then it was a Palestine including Jordan. It was not as though there was a Palestinian people in Palestine considering itself as a Palestinian people and we came and threw them out and took their country from them. They did not exist.

——这个是标准的政治家的语言,她说原先没有所谓巴勒斯坦国或者巴勒斯坦国国民这个说法,只有所谓的叙利亚南部和属于约旦的巴勒斯坦地区,所谓犹太人跑来抢走巴勒斯坦国的土地的说法是错误,原本就没有巴勒斯坦国或者巴勒斯坦国国民这个说法。

“They did not exist.”看你怎么理解,打算往歪理上引可以诬赖她说巴勒斯坦人不存在,按语境上看,人家的意思是“原本就没有巴勒斯坦国或者巴勒斯坦国国民这个说法”。人家很明确的说“their country”和质疑“an independent Palestinian state”,都是在明确这个国家和属民的概念

全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河