西西河

主题:实体经济的困局,是缺钱吗? -- cgangcm

共:💬74 🌺230 🌵3 新:
全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖
家园 "毛林共识"政治模型下, 搞活经济確實有餘地

I know my language is wield and sorry for that, it is a "china model":

"毛林共识"政治模型下, 搞活经济確實有餘地, how to translate it into English? it is not a language issue, it is a 模型 issue; and this kind of "china model" is a challenge to everybody's brain.

now, "毛林共识"政治模型下, 搞汽车业经济和房产业经济

gpp 7% for how many years already?

despite of all kinds of capital waste and political corruption of 物理学奇迹 level;

but again, for whatever reasons, "majority" of Chinese people support TG's "毛林共识"政治模型下, 搞经济; 那咱继续搞(:), again, how to understand and translate in english this kind of 脑残 social science of "china model"?

this is why I keep saying, have your children study physics, English, yesterday, and you 搞 money under "china model", get it?

now, x&l wants to play the same game, and wants to play it better, do things such like "政府现在要做的就是培育汽车业和房产业的小米"

again, this is 林毅夫's copycat model, it will work to some extent, for industries such as 汽车业和房产业.

咱继续搞: 不搞冠军搞亚军

as I said, this "毛林共识"政治模型搞经济 underwritten by 林毅夫's copycat model will work to those low-to-mid tier industries, how far It can go? we don't know, but it looks like 搞活汽车业和房产业 which is basically 城镇化, another 10 years is a piece of cake.

then what is problem? the problem is likely 政治问题, I don't really know, just guessing.

fundamentally, TG top is forward looking, in terms of TGtop=information processing system for china, kind of like US capital market is a forward information processing system for the white world.

information processing is by its nature a fundamentally forward looking model.

TG top is looking beyond 搞活汽车业和房产业, or in trader's language, that part is already priced in.

what they are forward looking about? I don't know.

forward looking translated in Chinese:

今天搞王体超,爽啊, 明天搞李游泳?

全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河