- 发帖可能变空内容,邪门暂不知所以然
- 『稷下学宫』新认证方式,24年网站打算和努力目标
主题:为什么说海牙的判决将是废纸一张?请入内细读 -- jent
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) wishes to draw the attention of the media and the public to the fact that the Award in the South China Sea Arbitration (The Republic of the Philippines v. The People’s Republic of China) was issued by an Arbitral Tribunal acting with the secretarial assistance of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA). The relevant information can be found on the PCA’s website (www.pca-cpa.org). The ICJ, which is a totally distinct institution, has had no involvement in the above mentioned case and, for that reason, there is no information about it on the ICJ’s website.
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂为啥就没人八一八这个法官呢 2 火候 字404 2016-07-13 22:23:33
🙂是的。刘振民说的一点都没错 9 jent 字1859 2016-07-13 11:37:51
🙂菲佣国独力支付律师费三千万美刀 丁一叮 字1597 2016-07-15 12:26:16
🙂国际法院主页也这么说了
🙂这才是我们正在做的!赞 36 jent 字715 2016-07-13 09:16:27
🙂几个妹妹手里拿着牌子有错别字 2 东方射日 字84 2016-07-14 13:54:40
🙂应该尽快开发几个度假胜地,国人放假就去那潜水, nautilus 字49 2016-07-13 23:22:02
🙂不温不火最好。 2 普鲁托 字202 2016-07-14 02:20:42