西西河

主题:从腾讯的波兰总统专机到李承鹏的朝鲜队员回去挖煤看中国JY -- 陈笑东

共:💬41 🌺225 🌵1 新:
全看树展主题 · 分页首页 上页
/ 3
下页 末页
家园 您的说法依据何在?
家园 zt:朝鲜四将“被失踪”始末 各大媒体摆乌龙?

 体坛周报特派记者克韩南非报道 18日晚,四名朝鲜球员安哲赫、金京一、朴成学、金明元,出现在了约堡郊区滕比萨的马库龙训练场,证明了此前24小时内有关他们“失踪”的消息,只是媒体的揣测和误传。

全文:[URL=]ttp://2010.titan24.com/2010-06-19/80680.html[/URL]

比较可乐的是:西煤积极找茬“揭露”朝鲜的非人道、非免煮,甚至不惜扑风捉影,而中国自诩有“独立思想”的jy记者也急不可耐地跟着摇旗呐喊,实在比较脑残了。。。

家园 坐等3000w亲友的版本。。
家园 一个国家或者民族的落后首先是这个国家或者民族的精英的落后

而精英落后的标志是这些精英不断指责本国或者本民族人民落后。

家园 对!自信!自尊!自强!才是一个民族一个国家永远屹立的根本
家园 大眼这么说的

“……从一个足球记者向一个公共的知识分子的转变”

看来他还有几分明白,用“公共的”知识分子代替了已经臭不可闻的“公共知识分子”,哈

至于博眼球的本事,我觉得韩寒甩他好几条大街啊

家园 好文。俺补充一个美国有良心博客对伊朗绿色革命标志人物

人物,NADA的报道是如何被欧美主要媒体操纵的揭露。很多人都不知道伊朗有两个NADA吧?请看报道。抱歉的很,暂时没时间翻译,只能让大家看原文了。

AGENDA-DRIVEN JOURNALISM AND THE LUST FOR “REGIME CHANGE” IN IRAN

http://www.raceforiran.com/agenda-driven-journalism-and-the-lust-for-%E2%80%9Cregime-change%E2%80%9D-in-iran

A woman named Neda did indeed die last summer on the streets of Tehran, gunned down by members of an Iranian militia. Her full name was Neda Agha-Soltan. But mixed in with the tragic footage of that Neda’s death, broadcast around the world in a viral video that galvanized world opinion against the Iranian regime, was a compelling Facebook snapshot of a smiling young beauty in a flowered headscarf.

Her name was Neda, too—Neda Soltani…

Until last year, Neda Soltani was a teaching assistant for English literature at Tehran’s Islamic Azad University, where she was doing graduate work on feminine symbolism in the work of Joseph Conrad. She wasn’t a supporter of the regime, but she also didn’t belong to any sort of active opposition group, even in the heady days after the disputed election. She was focused on her academic career above all else; while Iranians were marching in the streets, she was correcting her thesis. She led the prosaic life of Tehran’s silent apolitical majority. “I worked for 10 long years to get my position at the university,” she told Germany’s Sueddeutsche Zeitung in February. “I was earning my own money, I had friends, I would go out and I had fun.”

All that changed on June 20 of last year, when a choppy video appeared on YouTube depicting the gruesome and chaotic death of a young Iranian woman…The process began innocuously enough, resting on a foundation of journalism’s most basic building block: competition for a scoop. Working only with the first name heard on the YouTube video, international news organizations raced one another to unearth more information on the young women who died on camera. Forgoing fact checks, editors in New York and London allowed small details to get lost in translation as they communicated with their reporters on the ground: “Agha-Soltan” lost its hyphen, “Agha” was dropped entirely, or “Soltan” picked up an “i”…

。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。

Neda didn’t begrudge the initial error. There was some resemblance between her and the slain protester, after all. Neda thought the mistake was liable to correct itself eventually, but decided to speed the process along by reaching out to Voice of America, the U.S.-backed satellite network that was among the most strident in using her photo to agitate the Iranian public. In an email, she explained that there had been a mix-up; they had been using a false photo, and she included other photos of herself as evidence.

What followed was a disheartening education in applied media ethics. Instead of issuing a correction, VOA promoted the very photos Neda had used to absolve herself as “exclusive” images of the slain protester. The momentum of the story overwhelmed attempted interventions of the truth. Neda tried repeatedly to sway different networks and news agencies, but for all intents and purposes, she had lost control over her face. On Internet forums, her requests that her photo be removed were met with the accusation that she was a stooge for the regime. “You won’t take our angel away from us, you bastard,” one Internet commenter writes in reply to her plea. On June 23, 2009, the parents of Neda Agha-Soltan released for public use a photo of their daughter—the one who, in fact, had been killed—but it had trouble competing with the existing, if false, image of Neda for primacy as the face of Iran’s freedom movement…”

。。。。。。。。。

家园 李承鹏这人真不怎么样

除了用不知道怎么来的消息到处骂人之外就剩下虚张声势和色厉内荏,如果说那消息还有可能是真的话,最近他的表现只能用惨不忍睹来形容了

家园 搞政治投机其实最需要自律了,要不然很容易变成JY

比起多数人来说,韩寒倒还有点尺寸,挺厉害的

家园 英德之战后我手贱看了郝海东的评论

这孙子是不是也要走李大眼的路子?不过郝海东应该比李大眼有钱啊,不至于这样出位吧。

家园 说实话,铺天盖地的强势洗脑,想不NC很难。

一个人虽然聪明但还是很容易被媒体潜移默化的。

不过李大眼这个人很墙头草。

关于朝鲜队的评论被抨击后,我注意到他的评论有些改变。

一个评论为自己攻击朝鲜辩解,只是恨铁(中国队)不成钢;

一个评论说不要在足球里来发现人生观,这个完全就是在否定自己嘛。最喜欢变看球边启发沉默大多数的人生观的恰恰是这个家伙自己。

这家伙应该是点的透的,很多时候的确是哗众取宠。

全看树展主题 · 分页首页 上页
/ 3
下页 末页


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河