西西河

主题:破除票选即民主的巫思 -- 迷惑不解

共:💬35 🌺175 新:
全看树展主题 · 分页首页 上页
/ 3
下页 末页
家园 补充

A shadow has fallen upon the scenes so lately lighted by the Allied victory. Nobody knows what Soviet Russia and its Communist international organisation intends to do in the immediate future, or what are the limits, if any, to their expansive and proselytising tendencies. I have a strong admiration and regard for the valiant Russian people and for my wartime comrade, Marshal Stalin. There is deep sympathy and goodwill in Britain-and I doubt not here also-towards the peoples of all the Russias and a resolve to persevere through many differences and rebuffs in establishing lasting friendships. We understand the Russian need to be secure on her western frontiers by the removal of all possibility of German aggression. We welcome Russia to her rightful place among the leading nations of the world. We welcome her flag upon the seas. Above all, we welcome constant, frequent and growing contacts between the Russian people and our own people on both sides of the Atlantic. It is my duty however, for I am sure you would wish me to state the facts as I see them to you, to place before you certain facts about the present position in Europe.

From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic, an iron curtain has descended across the Continent. Behind that line lie all the capitals of the ancient states of Central and Eastern Europe. Warsaw, Berlin, Prague, Vienna, Budapest, Belgrade, Bucharest and Sofia, all these famous cities and the populations around them lie in what I must call the Soviet sphere, and all are subject in one form or another, not only to Soviet influence but to a very high and, in many cases, increasing measure of control from Moscow. Athens alone-Greece with its immortal glories-is free to decide its future at an election under British, American and French observation. The Russian-dominated Polish Government has been encouraged to make enormous and wrongful inroads upon Germany, and mass expulsions of millions of Germans on a scale grievous and undreamed-of are now taking place. The Communist parties, which were very small in all these Eastern States of Europe, have been raised to pre-eminence and power far beyond their numbers and are seeking everywhere to obtain totalitarian control. Police governments are prevailing in nearly every case, and so far, except in Czechoslovakia, there is no true democracy.

Turkey and Persia are both profoundly alarmed and disturbed at the claims which are being made upon them and at the pressure being exerted by the Moscow Government. An attempt is being made by the Russians in Berlin to build up a quasi-Communist party in their zone of Occupied Germany by showing special favours to groups of left-wing German leaders. At the end of the fighting last June, the American and British Armies withdrew westwards, in accordance with an earlier agreement, to a depth at some points of 150 miles upon a front of nearly four hundred miles, in order to allow our Russian allies to occupy this vast expanse of territory which the WesternDemocracies had conquered.

If now the Soviet Government tries, by separate action, to build up a pro-Communist Germany in their areas, this will cause new serious difficulties in the British and American zones, and will give the defeated Germans the power of putting themselves up to auction between the Soviets and the Western Democracies. Whatever conclusions may be drawn from these facts-and facts they are-this is certainly not the Liberated Europe we fought to build up. Nor is it one which contains the essentials of permanent peace.

The safety of the world requires a new unity in Europe, from which no nation should be permanently outcast. It is from the quarrels of the strong parent races in Europe that the world wars we have witnessed, or which occurred in former times, have sprung. Twice in our own lifetime we have seen the United States, against their wishes and their traditions, against arguments, the force of which it is impossible not to comprehend, drawn by irresistible forces,

家园 追问代表比例挺好的,是更深入的探讨

票选是有问题,但应该继续完善普选而不是把孩子和脏水一起倒掉,更不应该看到问题就把民主/票选污名化。

但代表出身的比例也不是决定性因素,阶级出身影响观点不能决定共识。目前人大代表都是兼职,很早以前就有人说改成专职代表行不行;人大代表如何联系选民,搞个集会行不行,接受选民物质资助或便利行不行;人大代表想搞调研,能不能向人大代表开放各种档案提供各种便利?

家园 知情权当然重要啊,但是比例,尤其是真的人的比例尤其重要

很多资本家冒充农民工、基层代表,也算是改开一大一大奇葩!

收买基层是要费尽心机的,同时当时还有四大,怎么可能没有监督力度啊,这是多方面的控制啊。

知识分子作为资本家的依附品,你的说法能不能被老百姓知道,一两次受骗,还能十年?不可能,第二届就会有明白人怼公知了。

而现在,确实没有这个机制啊。

家园 赞考据,讲究

应该是同一版本。你总结的更好。

家园 没有反对增加无产阶级在人大代表中比例

并且支持增加工人农民在党代会中的比例。

全看树展主题 · 分页首页 上页
/ 3
下页 末页


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河