- 程序有所改变。发帖如还有问题请报告
- 【征集】西西河的经济学，及清流措施，需要主动参与者，『稷下学宫』新认证方式，24年网站打算和努力目标
主题：关于《纽约时报》新疆照片的一些新线索 -- 雷声
来自同一篇blog的回帖：
First, the Barony Hotel (塔西南邦臣酒店) is neither located “across the street from a compound of people’s …” nor across the street from the Yiquan Hotel where the incident actually happened,
---------------------------------------
Now, it is worth comparing the map from "The New Dominion" with the photo of the Barony Hotel.
"The New Dominion" Map of the location of attack
http://www.thenewdominion.net/319/location-of-august-4th-kashgar-attack/
Photo of the Barony (the shape of the building)
http://www.cnpc.com.cn/tlmyt/dwfw/txn_bc/
http://qczg.youth.cn/wmhtj/200604/t20060428_318992.htm
Look carefuly at the shape of the building across the street of the location of attack.
I used to walk along the Seman road, and think the Barony is just infront of the location of attack.
Posted by: li-si at September 30, 2008 10:17 PM
来源：外链出处
不过疑惑依然存在：这些照片显然先出售给了AP，AP只肯要3张，刊出后未有任何反响。原作者添加了自己绘声绘色的评论后卖给了《纽约时报》。中间相隔两个月，为什么？
另外一帮老外讨论中国这样一个落后国家最偏僻的城市如同讨论自家后院，叫我有点毛骨悚然。
- 相关回复 上下关系2
🙂关于《纽约时报》新疆照片的一些新线索 4 雷声 字2322 2008-09-30 08:55:10
🙂【更新】现在有老外说Barony的确在怡金对面
