- 程序有所改变。发帖如还有问题请报告
- 【征集】西西河的经济学，及清流措施，需要主动参与者，『稷下学宫』新认证方式，24年网站打算和努力目标
主题：【讨论】原来史上最大的水坝灾害发生在中国 -- 笑看人生
According to the Hydrology Department of Henan Province[citation needed], in the province, approximately 26,000 people died[11] from flooding and another 145,000 died during subsequent epidemics and famine. In addition, about 5,960,000 buildings collapsed, and 11 million residents were affected. Unofficial estimates of the number of people killed by the disaster have run as high as 230,000 people.[12] The death toll of this disaster was declassified in 2005.[3]
你有更权威的数据？
你以为没人看你给的链接？
注释11
http://web.archive.org/web/20100628044057/http://www.hnsl.gov.cn/look0/article.php?L_Type=1&id=297
无法打开，根据注释位置提供的是26000人直接死亡的数据
注释12
.Goldstein, Lorrie. "'Safe' Power an Oxymoron". Toronto Sun. Sunday, March 20, 2011. Retrieved at <http://www.torontosun.com/comment/columnists/lorrie_goldstein/2011/03/18/17675461.html> on March 20, 2011.
是多伦多太阳报的文章
According to official estimates, the flooding killed 26,000 people and another 145,000 died of disease and famine. Unofficial estimates put the total number of deaths as high as 230,000.
该文章对于14万人间接死亡的数据来源没有任何解释，何来
注释3
"China Costs Huge Investments to Repair Reservoirs" by Xinhua Agency on Oct 13, 2010
是人民日报英文网站的文章，没有提到14万人间接死亡。
根据该注释的位置，只是说明数据在2005年得到官方“正式公布”
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂还有个原因，与水库工作人员联系中断。 njyd 字44 2011-11-29 08:54:45
🙂间接因传染病和饥荒死了14万人。这句话肯定不对。 2 桥上 字0 2011-11-27 00:18:59
🙂为什么肯定不对？ 笑看人生 字527 2011-11-27 00:33:15
🙂偷梁换柱而已
🙂各大论坛讨论那么多次,没人提过所谓"间接死14万人" 1 flyingcatgm 字24 2011-12-01 22:54:04
🙂送朵花，大水那年， 13 履虎尾 字499 2011-11-27 21:04:09
🙂其实重要的是对待事故的态度 2 笑看人生 字1438 2011-11-27 21:39:14
🙂所谓大灾之后有大疫 12 高野谪客 字312 2011-11-28 00:15:25