西西河

主题:让我们讨论新雨丝上的这篇文章吧 -- 山寺桃花

共:💬6 🌺5 新:
全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖
家园 就事论事的说几句

Study design: Case report.

Objective: Report rapid neurological changes in a complete tetraplegic following a cell injection procedure.

Setting: Beijing, China.

Methods: ASIA/IMSOP neurological scale. Immunostaining of cell cultures. Cellular transplantation to effect functional restoration following spinal cord injury (SCI) has been hypothesized to cause improvements through axonal regeneration, increased plasticity, or axonal remyelination. Several human trials are in preliminary phases. We report a rapid improvement in motor and sensory functions in the segment adjacent to the level of complete SCI within days following cellular transplantation of cultured fetal olfactory bulb-derived cells. The patient was an 18-year-old C3 ASIA A complete tetraplegic 18 months post-injury who had been neurologically stable for more than 6 months.

Results: Within 48 h of cell transplantation, the patient improved one ASIA motor grade in the left elbow flexors and began to show right wrist extensor function. Descent of the sensory level occurred within 4 days and then the rate of change slowed. He is now a C5 motor and C4 sensory complete tetraplegic. Cellular cultures prepared in the same facility showed viable human cells that labeled for nestin and GFAP.

Conclusion: We hypothesize that improved transmission in intact fibers subserving the zone of partial preservation accounts for these early improvements. We emphasize the need for further independent analysis of the outcomes of this and other preliminary cell transplant studies.

Keywords: spinal cord injury, cell transplantation, olfactory ensheathing glia, stem cells

以上是摘要全文。可以看出来,作者一上来,就先表明,这是一起病例报告。而且明确表明这是在中国北京操作进行的。读者只要是一看到作者的通讯地址,如下,就会马上想到。这个案例,肯定是合作的,而且评价的成分居多。

The Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Lois Pope LIFE Center, Miami, FL, USA

2The Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Lois Pope LIFE Center, Miami, FL, USA

3The Miami VA Medical Center, University of Miami, Lois Pope LIFE Center, Miami, FL, USA

Correspondence: JD Guest, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Lois Pope LIFE Center, 1095 NW 14th Terrace (D4-6), Miami, FL 33136, USA

接下来的方法与结果,结论,都是说的病人的术前术后的评价的方法和结论。由此可见,整篇文章主要集中在评价这个病例上面。并不是针对手术的操作而言。

接下来,是前言介绍,原文如下

Experimental studies have indicated that olfactory ensheathing glia (OEG) may support partial neurological recovery following spinal cord injury (SCI).1, 2, 3, 4, 5 The mechanisms of such recovery have been shown to include axonal regeneration2 and local sprouting,6 and remyelination.7 Sources for donor tissue to derive OEGs are limited in quantity8 and access to the olfactory bulb (OB) is invasive.9 Therefore, fetal allografts represent a possible alternative source from which to derive the cells. OEGs have been derived from embryonic rodent OB and characterized.10, 11 However, it is not known at what developmental stage the human OB becomes populated by OEGs although it has been proposed that this may occur as early as 6.5 weeks of embryonic development.12 Currently, a small-scale phase one clinical trial is exploring the safety and efficacy of transplanting adult nasal-derived putative OEGs into the chronically injured spinal cord,13 but the number of patients treated with fetal cell preparations in China exceeds 500. The first and third authors of this case report acted as observers of this transplant series14 over a 12-day period and wrote this report. These authors systematically examined the patient prior to surgery, observed the operative procedure, and followed the patient clinically for 8 days post-operatively.

请注意其中最关键的引文14,这个引文直接牵扯到了具体的手术问题。引文14如下

14 Huang H et al. Influence of patients' age on functional recovery after transplantation of olfactory ensheathing cells into injured spinal cord injury. Chin Med J 2003; 116: 1488–1491.

我认为,到此为止,作者的写作完全是符合业界内的规矩的。就是把所有的关键操作都给明确地指出来了。没有任何的含糊之处。因为本文主要是评价病人手术前后症状变化,所有的该给黄的credit都已经给了。

下面我就不再引用全文了。只是进行评价。

接下来的材料与方法,都描述得很详细。问题是,对于所有的手术操作,试验步骤,以及结果的获得,都是以被动语态写的,没有提到操作者。这就给大家一个错觉,感觉好像是作者们进行了手术,以及亲手获得检测的结果。关于这一点。我不知道内幕,因此不好评说。但是,按照惯例,如果的确是他们亲手检测的话,除了手术操作那一段,还要再加一次引文,并注明操作者是来自北京的合作者,无论是匿名还是说出姓名,这种写法是完全可以被接受的。

如果在这一段不写,在文章的最后,补注一个,也是可以接受的。或者用感谢的章节来声明也是可以的。文章的作者没有写,有些不合乎惯例。我不知道在医学杂志上发表是不是跟理科杂志上有些细节的不同。但是,这些漏洞,或者是缺陷。是很明显的。而杂志的几个审稿者和编辑都没有指出并加以更正,我认为这或许是业界的一个共识也难说。

就这篇文章来看,整个都是对于黄红云这种新手术的一个病例报告和评价。最后的结论也倾向于赞成这种新的手术方式。对于读者来说,他们看完之后,如果对于这篇文章感兴趣,那么第一件事就是要去找黄的具体操作文章来看。我绝对不认为这是对于黄的手术方法的一个剽窃。对于文章来说,除了没有在具体操作中提到他,或者应该在作者里面加上他的名字以外。整篇写作几乎是无懈可击。

黄认为这是剽窃的最关键的一点在于,是不是原始的检测资料是出自这两位作者的手,还是他们一起完成的,还是完全出自中方。就作者在摘要中提到的,我想,大家一起做的可能性比较大。因为,如果是新英格兰医学学报,我倒是要怀疑一下几个作者的人格问题。为了这么一个不是很出名的杂志上的一篇文章,来拿自己的职业冒险,是不值得的。如果是大家一起做的,这也就是资料共享的问题。理论上任何人都可以单独或者合作发表的。

依照blackbox提到的第8个问题。我想,有可能是黄不同意发表,认为写作有问题,或者对于发表的杂志不满,所以合作者决定撇开他自己干。或者是作者有点混水摸鱼,打擦边球的意思,让人误解自己也可以做类似的手术,为自己打广告。如果抛开国界问题,这只是一个合作者闹崩了之后的一个小纠纷问题。没有必要提到那么高的程度。这并不是真正的剽窃。

从新华网的报道来看,要么黄红云是真的一点也不了解杂志出版的规则,要么这就是一起人为的炒作。呵呵,我可是碰巧看了点别的东西,而且我对于国内的这种炒作也已经习惯了。

海军总院神经外科黄红云教授关于脊髓损伤的胡编乱骗有失医德 ZT 神刀

外链出处

所以,大家姑且看看好了。

全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河