西西河

主题:鹬蚌相争,渔翁得利 -- happyyuppie

共:💬1 🌺8 新:
全看树展主题 · 分页
家园 鹬蚌相争,渔翁得利

现在川总支持者跟美国媒体打得不可开交,对旁观者的一个意外收获是,一些鲜为人知的黑幕被揭出来了。比如最近狐狸新闻的一篇报道Trump threatens to release Lesley Stahl interview ahead of Sunday's '60 Minutes'下面的读者评论里有人讲了这么一段往事:

Back in the 70s, I went with my dad (an electrical engineer for GE) to a presentation by Illinois Power. They first showed the "60 Minutes" episode that was done about an IP nuclear power plant, pointing out all the lies the officials told and stuff like that. BUT, Illinois Power had done ONE thing right -- THEY HAD FILMED everything presented to the "60 Minutes" crew, and the additional footage PROVED WITHOUT A SHADOW OF DOUBT that "60 Minutes" had PURPOSELY distorted the information presented to them.

For example, on the flow chart for how long it would take IP to move the reactor from the rail car into position, it showed 4 weeks. "60 Minutes" showed they only took 1 day and stating that the time frame was purposely exaggerated. BUT IP's film showed the "60 Minutes" reporter being told that the 4 weeks included all the preparation and testing time required by law before the actual move, but THAT information was conveniently left out of "60 Minutes" show.

(《60分钟》是美国哥广CBS的一个专题节目)

早在70年代,我和父亲(通用电气的一名电气工程师)一起去看伊利诺伊电力公司(“伊电”)的演讲。他们首先播放了《60分钟》关于伊电核电站的一集,片中指出了伊电主管们所说的所有谎言和诸如此类的事情。但是,伊利诺伊州电力公司做对了一件事--他们拍摄了呈现给《60分钟》摄制组的一切,而额外的镜头毫无疑问地证明了《60分钟》故意歪曲了呈现给他们的信息。

例如,在流程图上,伊电将反应堆从轨道车厢移到适当位置需要多长时间,它显示为4周。《60分钟》显示他们只用了1天,并声称这个时间框架是故意夸大的。但伊电的影片显示,《60分钟》的记者被告知,4周的时间包括了法律规定的实际行动前的所有准备和测试时间,但这些信息被方便地从《60分钟》节目中省略了。

全看树展主题 · 分页


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河