西西河

主题:【原创】一计不成 又生一计 西媒集体发难中国新动向 -- 平天下

共:💬28 🌺15 新:
分页树展主题 · 全看首页 上页
/ 2
下页 末页
  • 家园 【原创】一计不成 又生一计 西媒集体发难中国新动向

    2008年注定不会平凡。

    在大国崛起的道路上,也不可能一路风平浪静,云淡风轻。

    3月以来,某些势力联合起来兴风作浪,借西藏问题发难中国,试图煽动中国人民(包括西藏人民)以及世界民众在民族问题、宗教问题和人权问题等方面反对中国政府、破坏中国国内的发展、稳定,妖魔化中国在国际的软形象进而损害中国实在的经贸利益,动摇中国政府的统治基础。他们完全错误估计了形势!出乎他们的意料,让他们大跌眼镜的是,广大中国人民、特别是海外华人空前地团结起来,发出了怒吼的声音!无论他们是否承认,无论西方“主流”媒体是否报道,尽管某些人还顽固地坚持成千上万反分裂、反歧视、支持奥运的海外华人被集体洗脑,尽管他们用“民族主义”、“政府组织”等标签来抹黑自发起来的华人华侨……事实是,那些别有用心的人确确实实地看到了,他们在中国人这里没有任何市场,反而让中国政府借此得到了强烈的mandate;他们在国际上也得不到广泛的支持,反而暴露了他们的真面目。他们的阴谋失败了。

    一计不成,又生一计。进入4月,5月在望。他们不愿看到北京奥运就这么顺利地召开,他们转移了战场,继续战斗。最近以来,西方的主流媒体在新闻和言论等版面,在中国的非洲政策上集体发难,鼓吹中国在非洲推行“21世纪的新殖民”,将中国在非洲的平等互惠的贸易交往抹黑成新式的殖民主义、掠夺资源,将中国不附加任何政治条件、不干涉他国内政的政策抹黑为缺乏原则、助纣为虐,将中国在一无所有、衣不遮体、食不果腹的黑非洲进行援助、发展工业抹黑为破坏环境、污染家园。他们似乎忘记了欧洲人在非洲殖民、侵略、贩卖黑奴的罪恶历史,他们仍然热衷于将自己的制度和文化强加给非洲的人民,他们宁愿非洲永远不发展、人民永远饥饿也不愿看到非洲的自然环境得到改变,他们只希望非洲永远是他们廉价的原料产地和倾销商品的市场,希望非洲国家的广大贫困、饥饿、缺乏医药和教育的人民永远由少数在伦敦、巴黎和纽约接受教育、掌握话语权、甚至挥霍无度的非洲权贵阶级统治。

    人民的眼镜是雪亮的。西方媒体集体发难中国,妄图将“殖民”的脏水泼在中国身上,和他们在西藏问题的作为一样,注定会失败!而且更加会暴露他们虚伪、邪恶的本质,会失败得更惨!这是因为,非洲不是西藏,如果说西方很多民众对于西藏缺乏了解、人云亦云的话,列强对于非洲的所作所为,还历历在目,西方各国正义的民众,对于殖民主义历史的反省,还念兹在兹。

    从网站上的反馈言论来看,西方民众对于西媒这种虚伪的宣传和破脏水的做法,看得是很清楚的。我们需要防止的,是不了解中国和中国做法的民众被蒙蔽。他们也许不同意历史上殖民主义的做法,他们也许对于西媒的虚伪性有足够的认识,但是在缺乏了解、偏听偏信的情况下,他们也未必会支持中国在非洲的政策。

    看看这些对中国非洲政策的攻击吧,这还仅仅是随手在网上找到的,最近不少主流媒体,很多地方报纸、杂志、出版物,对于中国的非洲政策,都有不少的评论和指摘。

    4月23日

    China's policy in Africa: MEPs on the alert

    欧洲议会就中国的非洲政策投票,关注中国

    http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/expert/infopress_page/028-27281-112-04-17-903-20080422IPR27269-21-04-2008-2008-false/default_en.htm

    4月20日

    China returns to Africa: A Superpower and a Continent Embrace

    《中国回到非洲:一个超级强权和一个大陆的接纳》

    外链出处

    4月19日

    The new scramble for Africa begins

    Modern imperialism on the resource-rich continent will be less benign than old colonialism

    《对非洲的新的争夺开始了:在资源丰富的大陆上的现代帝国主义比旧式殖民主义更加不善》

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/matthew_parris/article3775299.ece

    4月11日

    Why China is the REAL master of the universe

    《为什么中国是宇宙的新的主宰》

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=559133&in_page_id=1811

    把中国40年援助非洲公路、铁路说成是“侵略”,把当今中国经贸往来说成是“侵略”(invasion),联想到他们说“中国1951年侵略了西藏”,难道他们眼里“侵略”这个词是这么用的!简直是脑残。那么西方殖民者在非洲美洲划分土地、屠杀人民、奴役黑人、贩卖人口鸦片,这些算什么呢?

    看看这些反馈评论吧:

    While the success of failure of China's policy in Africa is still a debate and waiting to be seen, the failure of western policy in Africa could be seen quite clearly.

    The bottom line is, China's treat Africa as equals, the west treat Africa as children. Africa need more respect, to decide for themselves what they want and don't want. With China, they have the last word on the establishment of a business deal, with the west, they depend on the mood of the "parents".

    In my opinion, its better to build roads, schools and hospitals and then worry about whether or not they can benefit the people, rather than waiting for the country to self-transform into a political utopia first while a few million starve to death while waiting for it.

    iewgnem, toronto, canada

    Ultimately, we all are held accountable for keeping our governments accountable - if not by each other, then by the consequences of having our governments attend to priorities that are not ours.

    What is important are the day-by-day minute-by-minute choices people make and whether they are

    a) made locally or with intent to show solidarity with fellow citizens and

    b) symbolic of holding a government accountable for following our priorities or simply keeping one's head below the parapet.

    An academic reply but critical. If you startle a group of impala, they scatter in all directions. That is one choice. The other is to immediately close ranks and out stare what startled you. To do that requires trust that the other 'impala' will close ranks with you, otherwise you are left standing alone trying to out stare a threat.

    A practical way forward is to learn Mandarin. That alone is a gesture of standing firm.

    Jo, Olney, UK

    "Western moralising may sometimes be hypocritical, but it is surely preferable to the absence of any morality at all in dealing with the likes of Mugabe"

    -- should that be something that the Africans should decide for themselves? Maybe the African nations are not "recoiling" from Western hypocrisies, a short-coming that all human beings possess, to varying degrees. Instead, maybe they are recoiling from Western Chauvinism - the assumption that we are smarter and more capable of making the life-and-death decisions for the Africans than the Africans themselves. Maybe that is why the Chinese practicality is more attractive: they are there for trade and nothing else. They do not try to impose their values and they are not there to topple governments or instigate revolutions. That is for the Africans themselves to decide. Maybe that is what all of the third world wants from the west also -- to just be left alone to find their own ways. They see what we did to Iraq, and they know better.

    Mario Savio, Berkeley, California

    Well said, Dan.

    Many people (the disciples of Rhodes, I suppose) are still bitter over the loss of their "rightful" loots in Africa, and all too happy to brand anyone cooperating with their former victims as "thieves" or the new "colonialist". I guess according to these high-moral priests people in Africa should put up with occasional missile launched into their pharmaceutical factories from the Indian Ocean, or occasional outbreak of extreme violence funded by the oil mercenaries. A whole set of Encyclopedia Africana can be written on how Britain alone butchered, raped, and looted the continent. Righteous people have long memory.

    Ian Summers, Birmingham, UK

    "Beijing offers them a real alternative to dealing with the West and its heavy moral baggage "

    Unfortunately the west has lost its moral currency in Africa.

    Look at west's endorsement of Ethiopia's and Kenya's Elections

    Look at the suffering of the Somalis that is being instigated by the west encouraging Ethiopia to do their dirty job. I can go on .....

    African's see west's moral out rage when it just suits them.

    Dan, London, UK

    Thank you for reminding us of how benign old style colonialism was. I am gladdened to hear that Heart of Darkness, the Zulu wars, the India Salt Act of 1882, the use of poison gas in Ethiopia, the invention of the concentration camp in the Boer Wars, and the North American slave trade were just figments of the collective imagination.

    Theresa Yarmouth, Chicago, IL, USA

    人民的眼睛是雪亮的。中国的发展,不会在某些人的嫉妒、恐惧和叫嚣中停止!

    • 家园 这才是欧洲转向的原因,不过怎么地也比八九强多了

      欧洲集体转向,韩国也变脸。对中国是一个大挫折。

      欧洲转向的原因很大一部分是他们的战略后方非洲被中国抄了。

      各国上一届政府时,中欧俄韩一齐唱双簧,这种场面没有了。

      不过中国已经不是1989年时候的中国,俄国也重新崛起,总产值和平均收入已经回到大国行列。巴基斯坦已经有核武器,伊朗的石油在握,非洲国家等不到美元,自身的改革又是抵制自由化的。

      总的来说,老伙伴还是老伙伴,欧洲韩国都是墙头草,永远不能一条心。

    • 家园 看看所谓的Foreign Correspondents Club

      http://www.fccchina.org/

      http://www.fccchina.org/what/300408statement.html

      " April 30, 2008 -- One hundred days before the Olympics, death threats against foreign correspondents and official statements demonizing Western media risk creating a hostile environment for foreign journalists based in China and for tens of thousands of additional media planning to cover the Games, says the Foreign Correspondents Club of China (FCCC). "

      真是没辙, 还demonize了他们,这个Melinda Liu也写了很多捧ZD的话,其中一句"Tibetan kings in centuries past sent armies into Chinese territory to expand their empire. To this day the Khampas of eastern Tibet still pride themselves as horseback warriors." 她是在缅怀什么吗?

      http://www.newsweek.com/id/128543/page/2

      "To justify its crackdown, the government has portrayed the upheaval as a ruthless conspiracy spun by the exiled Dalai Lama, triggering bloody, racially motivated attacks by Tibetans against Han Chinese."http://www.newsweek.com/id/129615

      我怎么觉得是她在demonizing中国政府啊.她读中文新闻吗?新浪上可是充斥着政府要缓解民族矛盾的贴子啊,藏族同胞救助汉族同胞啥啊.

    • 家园 您这文章我倒是没什么不同意的

      就是太像大字报了,您那句“人民的眼睛是雪亮的”看的我后背都发凉。

    • 家园 这样并列好像有语病咧~

      把中国40年援助非洲公路、铁路说成是“侵略”,把当今中国经贸往来说成是“侵略”(invasion),联想到他们说“中国1951年侵略了西藏”,难道他们眼里“侵略”这个词是这么用的!简直是脑残。那么西方殖民者在非洲美洲划分土地、屠杀人民、奴役黑人、贩卖人口鸦片,这些算什么呢?

      1。俺们现在自然不是侵略

      2。西方当年是侵略,这个西方人自己也并不否认。

      并列起来,不是自己承认是一样的侵略了么?这样并列,恐怕黑兄弟们看了并不舒服~

      我们没有必要以西方人的先例为自己做事的理由。。。这种作法,仅仅是在用到西方自己身上的时候才有效--这在逻辑上叫:你作初一,俺作十五; 但是在涉及第三方的时候,要非常小心~ 否则,就成了“西方可以在非洲干坏事,俺也可以干”。那就与原意大相径庭了~

      至于俺们在非洲做的是好事还是坏事,要非洲的兄弟说才算。白人唧唧歪歪,没个蛋用~

    • 家园 侵略invasion 在英文里好像是个中型词。

      有点像“进入”,美国攻打阿富汗和伊拉克时,拥护美国军事行动的媒体都是一口一个“invasion”。 这是文化不同吧。西方文明是掠食的文化,侵略对他们来说是家常便饭。中国文明是农耕保守文化,常常是被 invasion. 所以侵略是贬义词。

      • 家园 西方文化中就没有侵略一说

        可见整个文化的无耻,就是利益,跟日本的“进入”有的一比。

      • 家园 Invasion是贬义

        中性词是Operation。

        • 家园 应该是中性,D-day,Iraq都是用的invasion
        • 家园 invasion和operation是完全不同的两个词

          invasion指的是在没有对方同意的情况下进入对方的地盘,不管对方是好是恶。operation可以是任何军事行动。如Operation Desert Shield美军在沙特完全是守势。直到美军完成了进攻的准备,才开始Operation Desert Storm。所以应该说invasion是operation(军事行动)的一种。

          • 家园 试释

            就如你所说的,Invasion是一种military operation,但是invasion明显的带有一种倾斜性,就是你所说的“不管对方的意愿”。

            当然说invasion是贬义是不完全的,invasion是褒义还是贬义是看当时的语境(context)。看看下面两个句子就很清楚了:

            1.The Knight invaded the cave of monsters and rescued the princess.

            2. The Monsters invaded the castle and killed the King.

            这个词我并不觉得他是中性就是因为它的倾斜性很强烈。但是如果因为这个词的双面性而你认为是中性的话,也无不可。

            最重要的是当西媒把中国和invasion放一起时,它肯定不是把中国当着是knight就对了。

            • 试释
              家园 中性词的定义不包括双面性吗?

              如果你也同意褒义贬义要看context,那就和invasion这个词本身没有关系了,你就是用visit都会有同样的结果。

      • 家园 我们不能中性理解

        关键在于,我一直认为invasion是指对另一拥有主权的国家或地区的占领。这是我们坚决不接受的。

        就连日本鬼子都有人辩称二战时它对中国的行为不是侵略。

        对西藏,我们应该是Recovery,再不济是Entry。

      • 家园 从英文词典上

        看不出invade可以当中性词讲解:

        这是美国mirram-webster上的解释,尤其其中的第一、第二条解释完全没有任何中性而言:

        1: to enter for conquest or plunder

        2: to encroach upon : infringe

        3 a: to spread over or into as if invading : permeate <doubts invade his mind>

        b: to affect injuriously and progressively <gangrene invades healthy tissue>

        http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/invade

分页树展主题 · 全看首页 上页
/ 2
下页 末页


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河