西西河

主题:【原创】人咬狗才是新闻:看伦敦奥运火炬接力的报道 -- 一着

共:💬48 🌺115 新:
全看树展主题 · 分页 下页
家园 【原创】人咬狗才是新闻:看伦敦奥运火炬接力的报道

刚看了BBC24新闻频道直播奥运圣火传递,感觉比历年伦敦马拉松比赛都有意思。英国和中国的警卫三圈把奥运火炬和火炬手团团包围在核心,面对沿途的示威者,一幅如临大敌的酱子,感觉不仅没有表达出火炬象征和谐,和平和团结的意思,反而让人强烈感受到北京奥运引起的争议和分歧。那个试图拿粉末灭火器灭“圣火”的,挺幽默的。想想,要真是“圣火”,还怕一个世俗的灭火器吗?:-))

许多人对BBC24电视的报道有批评,说只播放西藏抗议者,没有给支持中国的示威者足够的画面和声音。这些批评,和近来对cnn和其他西方媒体报道西藏不当的批评一样,忽视了新闻报道的一个要点,那就是,狗咬人不是新闻,人咬狗才会引起记者的注意。而对新闻媒体为党和国家作喉舌司空见惯的中国人自然对西方的新闻媒体一下很难适应。

如果这次奥运火炬在伦敦传递,一路顺风,没有抗议,只有欢迎者,媒体自然不会大张旗鼓地报道,这无可厚非,就像他们不会去大张旗鼓地去报到狗咬人一样。按照这个新闻的原则,支持中国的示威者照理也能得到和西藏抗议者一样的上镜率,那就是要做出类似“人咬狗”的举动,你只要反其道而行之,自然会受到媒体关注。但是反其道而行之之举,就是反潮流,需要的是个人的勇气,而不是一哄而上的“勇气”。

西方媒体受中国人诟病最多的就是说,他们的报道只抓住中国的阴暗面不放,对中国的成绩却视而不见。这个指责比较符合事实,因为新闻报道就是这样的。什么时候中国的新闻自由了,中国的新闻报道也不会像眼下这样在乎“官方”的主旋律。媒体的错误和失误当然可以指责和批评,但是不要搞过头到了为虎作伥的地步,去反对新闻的独立和自由。

家园 我们要做一辆坦克, 轰隆隆的压过一切螳臂当车的 魑魅魍魉。
家园 为虎作伥?

中国的成语还真是多啊。

人咬狗的原则这种娱记,狗仔队的原则也亏你想得出来。

可惜西方媒体还不愿意自甘堕落成娱记。就说前段时间多伦多的反藏独游行,加拿大的新闻如何报道的,已经有目共睹。对比当时在场的藏独的报道,呵呵,实在是可怜啊。

这里是美国报纸编辑协会(ASNE)原则声明(英文版)

ASNE Statement of Principles

ASNE’s Statement of Principles was originally adopted in 1922 as the "Canons of Journalism." The document was revised and renamed "Statement of Principles" in 1975.

PREAMBLE. The First Amendment, protecting freedom of expression from abridgment by any law, guarantees to the people through their press a constitutional right, and thereby places on newspaper people a particular responsibility. Thus journalism demands of its practitioners not only industry and knowledge but also the pursuit of a standard of integrity proportionate to the journalist’s singular obligation. To this end the American Society of Newspaper Editors sets forth this Statement of Principles as a standard encouraging the highest ethical and professional performance.

ARTICLE I - Responsibility. The primary purpose of gathering and distributing news and opinion is to serve the general welfare by informing the people and enabling them to make judgments on the issues of the time. Newspapermen and women who abuse the power of their professional role for selfish motives or unworthy purposes are faithless to that public trust. The American press was made free not just to inform or just to serve as a forum for debate but also to bring an independent scrutiny to bear on the forces of power in the society, including the conduct of official power at all levels of government.

ARTICLE II - Freedom of the Press. Freedom of the press belongs to the people. It must be defended against encroachment or assault from any quarter, public or private. Journalists must be constantly alert to see that the public’s business is conducted in public. They must be vigilant against all who would exploit the press for selfish purposes.

ARTICLE III - Independence. Journalists must avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety as well as any conflict of interest or the appearance of conflict. They should neither accept anything nor pursue any activity that might compromise or seem to compromise their integrity.

ARTICLE IV - Truth and Accuracy. Good faith with the reader is the foundation of good journalism. Every effort must be made to assure that the news content is accurate, free from bias and in context, and that all sides are presented fairly. Editorials, analytical articles and commentary should be held to the same standards of accuracy with respect to facts as news reports. Significant errors of fact, as well as errors of omission, should be corrected promptly and prominently.

ARTICLE V - Impartiality. To be impartial does not require the press to be unquestioning or to refrain from editorial expression. Sound practice, however, demands a clear distinction for the reader between news reports and opinion. Articles that contain opinion or personal interpretation should be clearly identified.

ARTICLE VI - Fair Play. Journalists should respect the rights of people involved in the news, observe the common standards of decency and stand accountable to the public for the fairness and accuracy of their news reports. Persons publicly accused should be given the earliest opportunity to respond. Pledges of confidentiality to news sources must be honored at all costs, and therefore should not be given lightly. Unless there is clear and pressing need to maintain confidences, sources of information should be identified.

These principles are intended to preserve, protect and strengthen the bond of trust and respect between American journalists and the American people, a bond that is essential to sustain the grant of freedom entrusted to both by the nation’s founders.

独立和自由是必须的,但是作为第一点的responsibility和后面truth and accuracy, impartiality, fair play在反藏独的报道中体现在哪里?


本帖一共被 1 帖 引用 (帖内工具实现)
家园 悄悄地献花
家园 这个兄弟你可以放长远一点看

当达赖只能跳大神来对抗解放军入藏时,当愤青棒棒们只能在中国大使馆门口手撕嘴咬中国国旗时,当反华疯狗们只能把注意力集中在那个象征性的火苗上时,你会感慨中国崛起的车轮是如何庞大,而他们螳臂当车的反抗是多么无力。

做个不恰当的比方,面对义和团喝符水,拍砖,拔电线杆,你要有八国联军的心态。

家园 这个要这样取舍。。

俺也觉得派保安保护有点小题大做。。。但是,执政者会这样考虑:从新闻效果上来说,是派保安这件被人诟病的事情延续持久呢还是火炬被灭火器扑灭会被人记的牢一点久一点?

家园 这个才是大国心态

Buckle up,在中国高速上坐稳看戏好了,

家园 奥运火炬接力是希特勒开始搞得

希特勒这个人,比斯大林,丘吉尔和罗斯福,更有艺术气质。后来有人贬低说希特勒是二流艺术家,其实也不见得是贬低。一个政治家,同时也是二流艺术家,说明素质还是比较全面的。江泽民多才多艺,但好像还没人说过他老人家的歌唱得好到能够成为一个二流艺术家。可能由于对艺术的兴趣,希特勒对1936年柏林奥运会的准备仪式也是分外的关注,就像他对德国国防建设的关注一样(据说希特勒亲自画图,设计过碉堡)。

奥运会火炬最初是在1928年阿姆斯特丹奥运上开始使用,但奥运火炬接力,则是纳粹德国开始搞的。设计者是carl diem,希特勒任命此人组织柏林奥运工作。希特勒重视奥运会,并且关注奥运仪式的具体细节,是因为他认为古希腊神话中那些身体健美的天神最能够体现雅丽安至上的种族优势,他希望奥运会能够成为对全世界庆祝第三帝国成就的盛会。希特勒亲自为柏林奥运筹备拨巨款。

奥运火炬传递的盛大仪式被纳粹德国著名的电影制作人Leni Riefenstahl拍在纪录片《奥林匹亚》中。她的电影还记录了希特勒和纳粹德国的崛起。

家园 so what

有话直说啊。

家园 明明藏独搞的是狗咬人么,怎么在英国就变人咬狗了呢

火炬传递,扯得上咬啊咬的么?疯狗才到处咬呢!

家园 灭火器不好使

要放“格杀打扑”了。真不容易,有新闻又有历史回顾的。真是“宣传的天才”!

“言辞和才智两件礼物,没有这些礼物,柏林的局势就无法控制。”

柏林。。。柏林咱不是不去么?

家园 本色露出来了吧

猴子红屁股,遮是遮不住地。搞笑得很哪,一开始还羞羞答答地东拉西扯一番。。。

奴儿喜,每帖净赚一块几

奴儿悲,认贼为父当乌龟

奴儿乐,中国要忍英法德

奴儿愁,穿上裤子还是猴

家园 跟女儿有什么关系。。。

人家又不姓“女”

家园 立马就改了
家园 这事儿应该早通知奥委会啊,全世界少折腾几十年呢
全看树展主题 · 分页 下页


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河