主题：投票【注意】视野里政治、时事、社会问题等相关话题的去向征求看法 -- 铁手
- 投票信息
单选，参与 70 / 17
- 复 我的建议
家园 酒兄果然深思熟虑 之所以坚决反对在淘客熙熙搞一个完全放任自流的版面，是因为，有时个别ID因旧日恩怨或其他原因而愤怒暴走，在有管理的版面无法上贴发泄自己的怒火，如果有这么一个放任自流的版面，那自然就会成为他们的发泄场所，从而对他人造成伤害。 - 复 我的建议
家园 还有这句话......偶看得目瞪口呆。。。。。。 以为最关键的问题不在于话题如何，而在于参与讨论的网友的心态和基本素质如何
咱们就是看文章，关键问题当然是话题， 文章啊，干嘛费劲猜人家的心态和基本素质？得罪得罪。。。。。偶也猜测一把行吗，您在大学肯定是重点培养对象， 混得很好的， 还可能学生会的。
家园 Believe it or not I was just the opposite. I was a laggard when at university. Lazy and laid back, but happily
家园 Haha, finally we have a common place to move on 家园 del - 复 del
家园 Nope, profiling is not that bad a word to use We’re doing profiling and segmenting every day at work, and talking about it everyday. It’s 'bad’ under certain circumstances, but it’s just a normal word in the study of people’s behavior. No big deal, really.
家园 haha, segmenting or segregating?
Profiling is not a bad for profiling you work.
But it is a very bad word for profiling people in a working enviroment or even a recreational area like CC.
家园 Really??? I doubt it. If you really think it’s bad, then how would you comment on the purpose and function of 新兵营? Isn’t that a sort of screening or profiling on people?
家园 Come on, brother! Have you even being trained right after you got a new job?
Isn't that the function of 新兵营? You think that is profiling? I don't think people will agree!
老票 ( 中文论坛西西河 cｃhｅre.com
标题：【注意】新兵须知－－－－刚下河的新兵们都请进来看看
西西河施行“新兵锻炼”制度，新注册的朋友需要在新兵营里锻炼一段时间之后，才可以去其他版面发贴或者回帖；
If you really think it’s bad, then how would you comment on the purpose and function of 新兵营? Isn’t that a sort of screening or profiling on people?
家园 Hehe, I think you need to know the difference between what’s explicitly communicated and what’s behind. I’m not saying they’re completely different, but usually the latter one has more meanings/considerations than the former.
Well if you really take New Soldier Battalion as a training session, I can also say talkcc.org is a training classroom for the people who want to participate in the political discussions in cc. Fair enough?
家园 哦！俺明白了！ 敢情有个“difference between what’s explicitly communicated and what’s behind”
家园 Well,brother,of course I ONLY believe what Tieshou said to us on board about the function of 新兵营!
Well, I would rather not know the difference between what’s explicitly communicated ( the rules) and what is behind. We would rather believe nothing is behind the rules.Is that also fair?
Hehe, I think you need to know the difference between
what’s explicitly communicated and what’s behind. I’m not saying they’re completely different, but usually the latter one has more meanings/considerations than the former.
Well if you really take New Soldier Battalion as a training session, I can also say talkcc.org is a training classroom for the people who want to participate in the political discussions in cc. Fair enough?
- 复 我的建议
家园 您。。。。的想法太吓人了..... 河友要参与这个版面的政治话题的讨论，必须额外通过一次注册和等待审批的程序。管理层对注册申请的ID进行审批时的依据，就是这些ID在淘客的表现。一贯心态平和、理性真诚的ID获批准，不时出现伤害他人言论的ID不被批准。
这么一来,就是将西西河ID分类，说白了， 好人和坏人。 行使这个审批权利,成立个西西河行为评定委员会?专门来考察“ID在淘客的表现”？评定人的资格，偶冒昧问一句， 您觉得您自己可以当评定人吗？这种做法偶强烈反对， 这种分类的手法太可怕。。。。。
比如。。。森林妹妹偶也和她斗过嘴。。。偶觉得无伤大雅。。。那偶就是上了黑名单了？偶可是佩服她如滔滔江水， 可她走了...
家园 Well, the thing is… People have the option whether they would want to subject themselves to the profiling or not. If you don’t have an appetite for political discussion, or if you’re satisfied with discussing it in talkcc.org, then you simply don’t have to apply (here apply = register).
The profiling (screening or filtering or whatever you call it) would apply only to those who want to join the political discussions in the board within cchere. It does NOT apply to everyone. It’s actually YOU who choose by your very own will to be judged and profiled. In this sense it’s very similar to taking a flight. You can choose not to take the flight, but if you do then you’ll have to go through the security check.
As for who is eligible for doing the profiling, well, obviously that’s the member of Lao Tie’s crew. I am not, as I am no longer on the crew.
家园 Oh, boy…..now it is really a shock to me.... People have the option (of) whether they would want to subject themselves to profiling or not ??????
If you don’t have an appetite for political discussion, or if you’re satisfied with discussing it in talkcc.org, then you simply don’t have to apply (here apply = register).
How dare you use the word “profiling” with such a light tone? It is a word most people would rather stay far away from, but you are using it as if it were a right or privilege. Well, it is a right, a fascist right, though!
Profiling is not management tool, brother! It is a political tool, just like the racial profiling, it is a very very wrong political tool.
Your scary point is that our behaviors or our decisions are to be profiled, and it is us who choose to be profiled. From this argument, one can even say racial discrimination could be legal.