主题:哲学与科学 -- 达萨
The theorem applies to the cases without transaction fee. Now you are using a case with large transaction fee to over turn the theorem. I know what your were trying to say. You meant that the assumption of zero transaction fee is not true, so therefore the theorem is not valid. In physics, there is no perfectly frictionless motion,so therefore Newton's 2nd law can be over turned?
Then why can Coase theorem still be a tool in the economics? Some economic activities have low transaction fee or even approach zero transaction fee.
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 16 层
🙂逻辑上的命题,反例不是用名词造句。 三力思 字1093 2015-07-28 10:54:52
🙂一一反驳 1 liaodaog 字1910 2015-07-29 22:39:50
🙂第一你没问过,完全是你自说自话 三力思 字391 2015-07-30 08:56:24
🙂if no transaction fee
😄精彩! 1 懒厨 字68 2015-07-24 00:36:24
🙂有一点需要澄清 懒厨 字1028 2015-07-23 19:48:18
🙂价值观判断 1 liaodaog 字43 2015-07-23 06:49:54
🙂既然是业主公有 青菜鱼 字749 2015-07-21 08:05:41